The Cocktail Spirit with Robert Hess
Recipe
Coffee Cocktail
- 1 1/2 oz port
- 1 1/2 oz brandy
- 1 tsp. simple syrup
- 1 whole egg
- dash Angostura Aromatic Bitters
dry shake (no ice), add ice and shake
strain into a wine glass
garnish with grated nutmeg


Comments
I notice you are using rich syrup instead of a 1: 1 simple. I prefer to use rich as well so as to not over-dilute. If one were to use simple, instead of rich, do you have a “rule of thumb” to adjust the recipe?
Poor old Jerry Thomas, gets himself quoted saying that without even realizing there were bitters in the cocktail after all.
Cocktail recipes are very flexible, with there rarely (if ever) being one single recipe that a particular cocktail should always be done with. You should treat any recipe that you see as simply “guidance” as to how to make something that holds faithful to what the originally intended product was. I use the same mindset in cooking as well. Perhaps following the specific recipe the first time I make a dish, but then always making my own personal adjustments to it from that point on.
Rich simple syrup (2:1) is going to impart a little more sweetness to a drink than standard simple syrup will (1:1), but I will typically use the exact same amount either way, and then if the drink tasted too sweet, or not sweet enough, adjust as necessary.
The end result, is that everbody will be making slight adjustments to their recipes to either fit their own personal tastes, or to fit the expectations of their environment/establishment.
Hopefully all of the recipes I present on my shows will reflect my own particular palate, and some of you might say “Robert’s drinks are usually slightly too sweet”, or “...not quite sweet enough”, and then you’ll know to automatically at a touch more, or a touch less of simple syrup, or juice, or whatever, so that these drinks will match your own palate a little more.
In this way, each of us will make our drinks ever so slightly different from one another. It’s part of the “participation” we play in the cuisine.
-Robert
The 1887 edition of JT’s guide does NOT include bitters in the recipe. I think Robert was adjusting the recipe to his personal taste, as he wrote above. Of course, if JT had added bitters, they wouldn’t have been Angostura.
Cheers!
Blair
I’m not sure how the bitters slipped into Robert’s rendition without explanation and in the face of JT’s own quoted commentary. At the very least, the bitters should probably be qualified as “optional”. However, considering that Harry Johnson specified garnishing the Coffee Cocktail with an olive (!), this is a minor quibble.
Ya know… I could have sworn that I had my standard disclaimer in there “...while the Jerry Thomas recipe notably doesn’t include bitters, I find that a dash or two just add that special touch to this drink, and so I always add them…”
But I guess I didn’t :->
Good to see you spreading the word about this one. It’s a great insight into the late 19th century palate - as well as being useful to coffee historians curious about what a standard coffee looked like, sure seems like milk must have been part of the deal.
Blair, JT’s bitters would have been Boker’s still in 1887, is that right? Isn’t that the flavor that Stephen Berg of The Bitter Truth said he was going for with his Jerry Thomas Bitters? Clove is the forward flavor there, but they are very complex. (A view of that bottle & some tasting notes on it & other bitters here http://www.flickr.com/photos/dinah/3319858309/ )
Dinah,
Do you have a source for Bitter Truth bitters in the US? I hate to pay shipping all the way from Germany!
Blair
Hi Blair,
They’re available at Cask in San Francisco and from their online store. http://www.caskstore.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=bitter+truth
But before you ship across the country, you may want to ask around to find out if anyone in New York is carrying them.
I’d also confirm prices direct from the source + shipping from Germany vs. Cask prices + shipping from San Francisco.
Good luck!
I just made one of these for the first time; it’s terrific! Thanks, Robert, for the recipe!
I did have one question about it, however. On your video, you’re using a ruby port and the drink appears, understandably, to come out purple.
I used an Australian tawny called Jonesy that’s my favorite inexpensive “port” and the drink really came out looking exactly like a coffee with milk.
Do you have any sense of what kind of port American bartenders in Jerry Thomas’s day would have had access to? Comparing the color of your drink and mine to the color of coffee, my guess is a tawny not a ruby.
Ben,
I’m not sure what types of Port/Porto would have been commonly available in America during the mid 1800’s, but I suspect they would have had the same we have now. But I agree with you that a Tawny port produces a more “coffee-like” color. I chose the ruby port because it was locally made here in Washington :->
Robert,
I’ve been to a bar that has something similar to this called the porto flip. Is there any difference? I suppose this is the original. Perhaps modern bartenders are reluctant to call anything without coffee a coffee cocktail.
But the chocolat cocktail in Kappelers “Modern American Drinks” include a dash of bitter. It just doesn`t include brandy. So to be precise your have to call your drink the chocolat coffee cocktail. But that sounds like starbucks.